By Osaretin Osadebamwen
Nigeria’s most damaging infrastructure deficit may not be roads, power or ports, but a weak education system producing too few work-ready citizens for an economy seeking to industrialise, digitalise and compete.
With about 10.5 million primary-school-age children out of school and only about one in four children aged 7 to 14 able to read a simple sentence or handle basic numeracy, education can no longer be treated as a peripheral social concern.
This is contained in a document the Seplat energy Manager, Corporate Communications, Stanley Opara, made available to TheIntercept news.
Opara who describe quality education as “core national infrastructure” urged the federal and sub-national government to prioritize education for the rapid development of the nation.
He said education must not be seen as gesture of good for the community but be seen as a tool that can transform the whole society when intentionally developed.
“This is why Nigeria must move beyond the old model of corporate philanthropy in education — the one-off donation, ceremonial scholarship or isolated classroom block — and encourage interventions that strengthen the full learning pipeline.”
According to him, the NNPC/Seplat Energy Joint Venture’s education model offers a useful example because it spans teacher development, student competition, school infrastructure, scholarships and entrepreneurship support.
Its value lies not only in scale, but in structure: it treats education as a system, not a photo opportunity.
Too often, companies still approach education through isolated gestures that create goodwill but little systemic change.
He said “Nigeria now needs a more disciplined and ambitious full value-chain approach that addresses teachers, students, learning environments, progression pathways and employability as linked parts of one ecosystem.”
What distinguishes the Seplat model is that it works across several pressure points at once.
Teacher quality is improved through structured capacity building. Student motivation is reinforced through academic competition and recognition. Schools receive infrastructure support. Scholarships widen access to tertiary education, while entrepreneurship training connects learning to economic independence.
The logic is simple: if a system is broken at several points, meaningful intervention cannot occur at only one.
The policy lesson is clear. Every serious sector in Nigeria depends on education for its future workforce: energy needs engineers and technicians; healthcare needs skilled professionals; agriculture and manufacturing need technical competence; and the digital economy needs software, design and analytical talent.
Poor education today becomes poor productivity tomorrow. Private-sector participation in education should therefore be recognised not as optional benevolence, but as enlightened self-interest and national economic strategy.
For government, the task is to mobilise private-sector capital and execution capacity through intentional partnerships with federal and state education authorities. For companies, the challenge is to move from random acts of generosity to structured interventions that improve learning quality, teacher capability, school infrastructure and access pathways.
Seplat Energy’s model is worthy of attention because it goes beyond the one-off gesture. It links teachers to students, students to facilities, facilities to opportunity, and opportunity to long-term development. Nigeria does not need just more corporate interventions in education; it needs better-designed ones, Opara stated.
